[ccpw id="39382"]

HomeCrypto NewsMarketRipple Tackles Terra Judge Ruling, Opposes SEC Appeal on 3 Grounds

Ripple Tackles Terra Judge Ruling, Opposes SEC Appeal on 3 Grounds


Written By:

Latest News

Ripple has opposed the SEC’s request to file an interlocutory appeal while addressing Judge Rakoff’s decision regarding its victory.

- Advertisement -

Leading blockchain company Ripple Labs has filed an opposition to the SEC’s anticipated interlocutory appeal motion relating to the summary judgment decision by Judge Analisa Torres.

In an August 16 letter shared by seasoned lawyer James K. Filan, Ripple asked the court to reject the SEC’s anticipated motion for leave to file an interlocutory appeal.

- Advertisement -

Ripple Opposes SEC Appeal Request on 3 Grounds

The defendants opposed the appeal on three grounds. Firstly, Ripple argued that the summary judgment decision laid down by Judge Torres on July 13 does not involve a controlling question of law.

Secondly, the leading blockchain company and its execs argued that the SEC could not show a substantial ground for a difference of opinion.

Thirdly, Ripple stated that an immediate appeal by the SEC would not advance the termination of the litigation.

It bears mentioning that an interlocutory appeal occurs when a court ruling is appealed while the case is still proceeding. The Ripple lawsuit still has pending issues- the SEC’s case against Brad Garlinghouse and Chris Larsen.

- Advertisement -

Notably, the SEC claims that Garlinghouse and Larsen were reckless in allowing Ripple to distribute XRP the way it did.

SEC Makes Interlocutory Appeal Request

Although there are still unresolved issues in the lawsuit, the SEC is requesting to file an interlocutory appeal. The SEC aims to appeal Judge Torres’ decision on Ripple’s programmatic sales of XRP and other distributions.

Meanwhile, the securities regulator will not challenge the ruling on Ripple’s sales of XRP to institutional investors. It will also not appeal to the non-security status of XRP.

Ripple lawyers argued that it is more appropriate for the SEC to appeal the court’s ruling after a final judgment.

Ripple Addresses Terra Judge Ruling 

In an attempt to get its request approved, the SEC argued that there is a “controlling question of law on which there is substantial ground for differences of opinion.”

According to the SEC, there is already an intra-district split in the Ripple ruling, as seen in the SEC v. Terra lawsuit. As reported, Judge Jed Rakoff, the judge overseeing the Terra case, rejected Judge Torres’ logic in the Ripple ruling.

Judge Rakoff rejected the reasoning, stating that the Howey test does not distinguish between buyers as Torres did. Thus, the SEC used the ruling as a basis to seek approval for its interlocutory appeal request.

Fox Business journalist Eleanor Terrett highlighted how Ripple tackled Judge Rakoff’s decision.

In its letter, Ripple stated that its programmatic sales of XRP differ from Terra’s sales.

Ripple Labs referenced the SEC’s claim against Terra, showing how the company and its founder Do Kwon promised “rates of returns of 19-20% on the coin owners’ initial investment.”

Furthermore, Ripple pointed out that Terra and its founder conducted a public campaign encouraging retail and institutional investors to purchase their crypto assets.

In contrast, in her summary judgment decision, Judge Torres found that Ripple did not make any promises or offers to retail investors during programmatic sales of XRP.

It added that the Terra judge also agreed with Judge Torres that digital asset sales alone are not inherently securities offerings.

Reaction Trail Ripple’s Opposition 

As expected, the crypto community has been reacting to Ripple’s opposition to the SEC’s interlocutory appeal request. Reacting, pro-XRP lawyer John Deaton described Ripple’s response as “excellent.” 

However, he expects Ripple’s execs to make stronger arguments in their response to the request. Deaton said he would have speculated that Judge Torres would deny the SEC’s appeal request if Rakoff did not reject her logic.

“But with the Rakoff ruling out there, [Judge Torres] allowing the SEC to write a formal motion will give her an opportunity to further demonstrate why her decision is sound and BASED ON EVIDENCE,” Deaton added.

Attorney Jeremy Hogan also reacted to the development, stating that Ripple made solid arguments.

He noted that if the SEC’s interlocutory appeal is allowed, Ripple will get its “contractual obligations arguments in front of the Second District Court of Appeal. Attorney Hogan speculated that multiple amicus briefs would be filed in the case.

Follow Us on Twitter and Facebook.

Disclaimer: This content is informational and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author's personal opinions and do not reflect The Crypto Basic’s opinion. Readers are encouraged to do thorough research before making any investment decisions. The Crypto Basic is not responsible for any financial losses.



Lele Jima
Lele Jima
Lele Jima is a cryptocurrency enthusiast and journalist who is focused on educating people about how the nascent asset class is transforming the world. Aside from cryptocurrency-related activities, Jima is a lover of sports and music.

More from Author