Home Blog Page 6

Ripple CEO Steps in to Support XRP Against RLUSD

0

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has stepped directly into the growing debate over whether Ripple USD could reduce XRP’s role, arguing that RLUSD is competing with other stablecoins—not with XRP.

The clarification comes as sections of the XRP community question how increasing institutional use of RLUSD translates into demand for XRP, particularly when some transactions can settle directly in the dollar-backed asset.

“RLUSD isn’t competing with XRP. It’s competing with other stablecoins. Use case matters, and I want those use cases running on the XRPL,” Garlinghouse said in a Nov. 3 response on X.

 

XRP trades around $1.28, keeping the debate particularly relevant as Ripple continues announcing institutional adoption while XRP remains well below its historical high.

RLUSD Growth Raises a Different Question for XRP

Garlinghouse was responding to XRP community researcher WrathofKahneman, who argued that increasing RLUSD liquidity is ultimately positive for XRP because deeper XRP Ledger liquidity can make XRP easier to use.

However, the post also highlighted an important distinction: if XRP is not directly involved in a transaction, any effect on XRP price would be secondary rather than direct.

This creates a broader question for XRP’s future—whether it becomes a highly specialized institutional liquidity asset or achieves much wider use across payments and financial applications.

That concern has become increasingly visible across the XRP community as Ripple expands RLUSD into institutional settlement, collateral, treasury and payments use cases.

Ripple’s own product documentation confirms that the two assets are designed for different purposes. XRP is the native asset of the XRP Ledger and is designed to provide bridge liquidity, while RLUSD is a dollar-backed stablecoin aimed at transactions where price stability is important.

Can RLUSD Bypass XRP?

This is where the XRP Army debate becomes more nuanced.

An institution can settle a dollar-denominated transaction directly in RLUSD without routing the principal amount through XRP. That means every new RLUSD payment does not automatically translate into equivalent XRP buying demand.

Garlinghouse has acknowledged this distinction before. In September, he said a stablecoin could solve some payment problems better than XRP, stressing that Ripple should choose the asset that best meets customer requirements.

But that does not mean RLUSD removes XRP from the XRP Ledger.

XRP remains the native asset used for network fees, while XRPL’s decentralized exchange can route transactions through XRP when doing so provides a more efficient path between two assets. Recent data showed XRP acting as a bridge asset across 11,009 XRPL DEX trades.

Ripple similarly says XRP remains particularly useful for providing liquidity between assets and currencies where direct liquidity is limited.

More RLUSD Does Not Automatically Mean Higher XRP Price

The distinction between network benefit and price impact is central to the dispute.

More RLUSD activity on XRPL can increase transactions, liquidity and trading opportunities without requiring every dollar of RLUSD volume to purchase XRP first.

On-chain data has previously supported the view that RLUSD growth is increasing XRP Ledger activity rather than simply replacing XRP. Separately, an XRPL validator recently emphasized that RLUSD remains optional while XRP performs native functions on the ledger.

Still, neither greater XRPL activity nor higher stablecoin liquidity establishes a proportional increase in XRP price.

That leaves the more important long-term question unresolved: how frequently will growing institutional activity on XRPL require XRP directly for liquidity, bridging, and settlement rather than using XRP only for the ledger’s native functions?

Garlinghouse’s latest statement makes Ripple’s position clear—RLUSD is intended to win stablecoin use cases and bring those use cases onto XRPL. Whether that expansion also produces substantially greater direct demand for XRP will depend on how institutions ultimately use the network.

Crypto Price Analysis, ETH, XRP, XMR, LINK and PEPE, Nov. 4: Monero Clears Resistance as XRP Pulls Back and Chainlink Weakens

Monero clears resistance as XRP retreats below $1.27 and Chainlink weakens. November 4 analysis covers ETH, XRP, XMR, LINK and PEPE with key levels and charts.

Asset Latest USD price Past 24 hours 24-hour market volume Market-cap rank
Ethereum (ETH) $2,244.05 −0.28% $8.90 billion 2
XRP $1.26 +0.54% $1.71 billion 5
Monero (XMR) $624.94 +2.53% $169.81 million 12
Chainlink (LINK) $10.74 −3.38% $267.04 million 17
Pepe (PEPE) $0.00000481 +2.40% $380.92 million 45

 

Ethereum’s RSI Improves but the Recovery Remains Below $2,279.80

Ethereum closed Tuesday at $2,271.45, up 0.98%, after trading between $2,237.46 and $2,304.60. The entire session stayed within Monday’s range, so the gain did not establish a breakout above the preceding daily high.

ETH Price Analysis 2026 11 04
ETH/USD daily RSI rises to 36.57, but Tuesday’s close remains below $2,279.80. Support lies near $2,233.51 and $2,170.

The latest $2,244.05 price was 2.70% below the price recorded in our November 2 analysis. That report identified $2,279.80 as an important recovery level. Tuesday traded above it but finished below it, leaving the reclaim unconfirmed on the daily chart.

The daily 14-period Relative Strength Index, calculated with Wilder smoothing, rose to 36.57 from 33.11. Selling momentum eased, but RSI remained below the neutral 50 level. The last completed four-hour reading was 49.60, also short of a clear bullish momentum signal.

A daily close back above $2,279.80 would improve the recovery. Clearing Monday’s $2,314.32 high and the nearby $2,319.54 resistance would provide stronger confirmation. Conversely, losing the $2,233.51–$2,237.46 support area would expose October 30’s $2,170 low. A daily close beneath $2,170 would invalidate the recovery from that low.

XRP Breaks Above $1.27 Before Giving Back Part of the Advance

XRP closed Tuesday at $1.27496, gaining 2.16%, after reaching $1.28923. That close cleared Monday’s $1.26254 high and October 30’s $1.27214 high, improving the daily structure. However, the latest $1.26 price had already slipped back beneath both levels during Wednesday’s unfinished session.

XRP Price Analysis 2026 11 04
XRP/USD closes above $1.27 but remains beneath its falling $1.29547 daily Bollinger midpoint; the latest price has retreated below the breakout area.

The move also followed the $1.23–$1.27 compression zone highlighted by The Crypto Basic. The four-hour candle ending November 3 at 16:00 UTC closed at $1.27871, above $1.27 and its upper Bollinger Band. The next two four-hour candles also closed above $1.27, confirming the initial short-term break before the latest retreat.

Daily Bollinger Bands, calculated from a 20-day simple moving average and two population standard deviations, show a less advanced recovery. Tuesday closed below the $1.29547 midpoint, which continued to fall. The lower and upper bands stood at $1.22798 and $1.36296.

A renewed hold above $1.27214 would restore the immediate breakout area. A daily close above $1.28923 would then put the midpoint near $1.29547 in focus. Failure to hold Tuesday’s $1.24333 low would weaken the recovery and expose $1.23364, followed by the lower band. A daily close below October 30’s $1.19685 low would invalidate the broader stabilization attempt.

Monero Confirms a Break Above the Prior Resistance Cluster

Monero closed Tuesday at $629.86, up 4.27%, after a $602.20–$636.90 session. The close cleared $609.88, $614.90 and $618.56, the successive recovery obstacles identified in Tuesday’s price analysis. Unlike Monday’s intraday advance, this move held above those levels at the daily close.

XMR Price Analysis 2026 11 04
XMR/USD closes at $629.86 above its prior resistance cluster and rising 20-day and 50-day EMAs, with $636.90–$638.87 the next resistance zone.

The daily moving averages support the improving structure. The 20-day exponential moving average rose to $592.82 from $588.92, while the 50-day EMA increased to $561.54 from $558.75. Price remained above both, with the faster average already above the slower one. This is an existing bullish alignment, rather than a newly confirmed crossover.

The latest $624.94 price had eased from Tuesday’s close but remained above the reclaimed resistance cluster. Holding that area would preserve the strongest part of the breakout.

A daily close above the $636.90–$638.87 resistance zone would strengthen the case for a test of $649.40, followed by the October 22 high at $656.74. A return below $614.90 would weaken the breakout, with Tuesday’s $602.20 low and Monday’s $596.76 low providing subsequent support. A daily close below October 30’s $572.49 low would invalidate the broader rebound.

Chainlink’s Bearish MACD Gap Widens as Price Slips Below $11

Chainlink closed Tuesday at $11.01603, down 0.78%, recording its third consecutive daily decline. The $11.28905 high was below Monday’s $11.42552 high, while the session low of $10.99545 remained just above Monday’s $10.97921 floor.

LINK Price Analysis 2026 11 04
LINK/USD’s daily MACD histogram widens below zero as Tuesday records a third consecutive decline. Structural support sits at $10.51969 and $10.25.

The latest $10.74 price was below both lows. That represents further weakness during the active session, but Wednesday has not yet confirmed a daily close beneath them.

Daily MACD, using 12- and 26-period exponential averages with a nine-period signal EMA, remained bearish. The line stood at −0.42178 against a −0.38648 signal. The histogram widened below zero to −0.03529 from −0.03302. This was deterioration within an existing bearish relationship, not a fresh line-signal crossover.

The latest completed four-hour candle also carried a negative histogram, at −0.02761, indicating that short-term momentum had not reversed by the technical cutoff.

Reclaiming $10.97921–$10.99545 would be the first repair. A daily close above $11.28905 would challenge the latest lower high, with $11.42552 the next confirmation level. Continued trading below the broken floor would leave October 29’s $10.51969 low exposed. Beneath that, October 30’s $10.25 low is the main support; a daily close below it would invalidate the rebound from that base.

PEPE Rebounds but Daily Volume Remains Below Average

PEPE closed Tuesday at $0.000004858, gaining 1.93%, after trading between $0.000004651 and $0.000005012. It formed a higher high and higher low than Monday, but finished below Monday’s $0.000004986 high. The intraday recovery therefore lacked a closing breakout above that earlier resistance.

PEPE Price Analysis 2026 11 04
PEPE/USD gains 1.93% on daily turnover approximately 38% below its preceding 20-session average, leaving $0.000005012 as the first breakout test.

Trading participation was also relatively light. Turnover in the chart’s USD market reached 519.78 billion PEPE, compared with a preceding 20-session average of 844.28 billion. Volume was approximately 38% below that average and 30% below Monday’s total. The price recovery is visible, but participation did not expand alongside it.

The latest $0.00000481 price remained below Tuesday’s close despite a 2.40% gain over the past 24 hours. Those figures cover different periods.

A daily close above $0.000005012 would clear Tuesday’s high, bringing $0.000005055–$0.000005095 into view. A stronger recovery would need to overcome that zone before challenging October 30’s $0.000005317 high. Losing $0.000004651 would weaken the higher-low formation, with $0.000004586 next. A daily close below October 30’s $0.000004292 low would invalidate the broader rebound.

TCB Daily Edition: What Happened in Crypto on November 3, 2026

North Korea rejected accusations linking it to the Binance theft, while the exchange released new details about how attackers penetrated its systems. November 3 also brought developments in stock derivatives, blockchain privacy, institutional payments and Bitcoin infrastructure.

North Korea Denies Responsibility for Binance Hack

Kim Yo Jong rejected the allegation that North Korea orchestrated the roughly $6.3 billion Binance theft, according to a statement carried by state media on November 3. The sister of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un portrayed the accusation as politically motivated and evidence of Washington’s hostility. Her denial followed the FBI’s attribution of the attack to North Korean cyber activity it calls TraderTraitor.

Binance Details Employee Compromises Behind the Theft

Binance’s initial incident report described a prolonged campaign involving malicious software, a fraudulent recruitment process and compromised employee computers. According to the exchange, attackers used stolen credentials and an internal AI tool to reach systems connected to wallet signing before executing the October 29 theft. Binance said it had tightened security controls and was commissioning an independent cybersecurity review.

CFTC Clears Path for U.S. Single-Stock Perpetual Futures

CFTC Chairman Michael Selig announced that perpetual futures tied to individual stocks could begin trading on qualifying U.S. exchanges. Eligible venues must be registered with the CFTC and also hold the required SEC registration for security futures. The contracts fall under both agencies’ regulatory frameworks, extending a trading format widely used in crypto into U.S. equity derivatives.

Bullish Names Three Networks for Tokenized Shares

Bullish selected Solana, Aptos and Ethereum as the first blockchain partners for its equity tokenization services. The company already uses Solana and plans to extend its capabilities to Aptos and Ethereum, giving issuers additional networks on which to make their shares available. Under the proposed approach, the transfer agent continues to maintain the official ownership record.

Jupiter Adds Asian Stock Exposure Through Chainlink Data

Jupiter introduced perpetual contracts tracking Asian companies including TSMC, Tencent, Samsung, SK Hynix and BYD, using Chainlink’s expanded APAC Equities Streams. The November 3 data expansion covers exchanges across China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and Hong Kong. The contracts give traders exposure to stock-price movements without conveying ownership of the underlying company shares.

Aztec Announces Tierra Upgrade for Private Applications

Aztec unveiled Tierra, its Alpha V6 release, with security fixes and performance improvements for its Ethereum privacy network. The foundation said private transaction proofs can now be generated in approximately one second on native devices, twice as fast as before. It also reported that Ethereum-to-Aztec message delivery can take as little as 12 seconds, compared with a previous average of two minutes.

Liquid Confirms Bitcoin Reserve Shortfall Has Closed

The Liquid Federation announced that its reserves once again provide one Bitcoin of backing for every LBTC following September’s exploit. Federation board member Samson Mow identified Blockstream as the source of the replacement Bitcoin used to close the remaining gap. The update confirmed restored backing but did not establish that all restrictions on direct federation withdrawals had ended.

Alchemy Pay Connects Fiat Payments to Walt

Alchemy Pay announced an integration with Walt, the digital-asset application accessible through Telegram, enabling supported crypto purchases and sales using conventional payment methods. The company said the service reaches users across 173 countries through its payment infrastructure. The integration gives Walt users another way to fund their accounts directly within the application.

HashKey Adopts Standard Chartered’s Tokenized Deposits

HashKey announced that it is using Standard Chartered’s tokenized deposit service for institutional treasury management and settlement. The arrangement allows eligible bank balances to move within an approved blockchain environment, helping HashKey manage funds across its businesses beyond conventional banking cut-off times. This is a new customer adoption announcement following Standard Chartered’s November 2 product launch.

South Korea Reviews Central Cybersecurity Authority

President Lee Jae Myung instructed officials to examine a government-wide cybersecurity body, citing the Binance attack during a November 3 Cabinet meeting. He called for stronger coordination between public agencies and private businesses, including earlier threat detection and faster sharing of warnings. The proposal remains under review, with the government yet to settle the body’s structure or establish it.

Bitcoin Miner Abits Explores AI and Computing Hosting

Abits Group announced plans to assess whether its existing U.S. infrastructure could support artificial intelligence and high-performance computing customers alongside Bitcoin mining. Its initial work will examine electricity capacity, cooling, connectivity, upgrade costs and potential commercial arrangements. The company said it has not signed definitive hosting agreements, and any deployment would depend on financing, customer demand and technical feasibility.

XRP ETFs Attract Fresh Capital Despite $633M Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF Losses

0

XRP ETFs recorded positive net flows last week, extending their run of weekly inflows while Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana ETFs saw significant withdrawals. 

This came amid renewed pressure across the crypto market following the Binance hack on Oct. 29, which triggered sharp price declines and prompted investors to pull money from several crypto investment products.

XRP ETFs Maintain Positive Flows Despite Market Decline

Specifically, XRP ETFs recorded $4.32 million in net inflows last week, slightly higher than the $4.25 million recorded in the previous week ending Oct. 23. While the latest figure may appear small, it is noteworthy given the market conditions following the Binance hack on Thursday, Oct. 29.

XRP ETFs record weekly inflows despite Bitcoin, Ethereum and Solana losses
XRP ETFs record weekly inflows despite Bitcoin, Ethereum and Solana losses

The incident triggered a broad market decline, with several cryptocurrencies losing value as investors rushed to reduce their exposure. 

It also led to sudden withdrawals from crypto ETFs toward the end of the week. Despite this pressure, XRP ETFs managed to finish the week with positive net flows.

The main reason was the $8.43 million in daily inflows recorded on Oct. 29. Notably, Franklin Templeton’s XRP ETF (XRPZ) and Bitwise’s XRP ETF (XRP) accounted for this entire amount. 

This strong daily inflow helped offset withdrawals recorded during the week, including $496,000 on Oct. 29 and $3.61 million on Oct. 26. As a result, XRP ETFs finished the period with $4.32 million in net inflows.

Bitcoin ETFs Lose $202 Million in One Week

While XRP ETFs attracted fresh capital, Bitcoin ETFs recorded $202.59 million in net outflows last week. Most of the pressure came from a single trading session following the Binance hack.

Notably, on Oct. 30, Bitcoin ETFs saw $643.33 million in daily outflows after the security incident on Oct. 29. This was their largest single-day withdrawal since June 25, 2026, when investors pulled approximately $696 million from the products.

Bitcoin ETFs record weekly outflows following the Binance hack
Bitcoin ETFs record weekly outflows following the Binance hack

The latest $643.33 million withdrawal wiped out the inflows Bitcoin ETFs had recorded during the early and middle parts of the week. Essentially, those earlier gains were not enough to prevent the products from ending the week with $202.59 million in net outflows.

Ethereum ETFs Face Continued Withdrawals

Ethereum ETFs also struggled last week, recording $431.53 million in net outflows. However, their performance was different from that of Bitcoin ETFs. While Bitcoin’s weekly figure was largely driven by one massive withdrawal, Ethereum ETFs faced selling pressure over several days.

The withdrawals started before the Binance hack on Oct. 29 and continued throughout the week. Ethereum ETFs recorded daily outflows across multiple trading sessions, with the largest reaching $155.85 million on Oct. 30.

These repeated withdrawals pushed their total weekly outflows to $431.53 million, and this made Ethereum ETFs some of the biggest losers among crypto investment products during the period.

Solana ETFs Record Biggest Weekly Outflow Since Launch

Solana ETFs also experienced heavy withdrawals, recording $71.47 million in net outflows last week. This marked their largest weekly outflow since the products launched in October 2025.

Like Ethereum ETFs, Solana ETFs faced consistent withdrawals throughout the week instead of one unusually large outflow accounting for most of their losses.

The pressure continued around the Binance hack, with Solana ETFs recording $27.69 million in daily outflows on Oct. 29 and another $10.74 million on Oct. 30, following the incident. These withdrawals contributed to their record weekly outflow of $71.47 million.

XRP and ZCash ETFs Stand Out

Apart from XRP, ZCash (ZEC) ETFs were the only other crypto ETF products to record positive net flows last week. All other cryptocurrency ETFs either experienced outflows or recorded zero flows. Specifically, ZEC ETFs attracted $17.72 million in net inflows during the week.

XRP ETF inflows were particularly noteworthy because they came despite continued weakness in the asset’s price. On the day of the Binance hack, XRP fell by 6.64%, contributing to its overall 3.51% decline last week.

XRP Sunday Wallet Surge Makes Sustainability—not Size—the Next Test

0

XRP Ledger network growth surged to 7,934 new wallets on Nov. 1, marking the sixth-highest daily total of 2026 even as XRP remained pinned near $1.25.

The spike stands out not only because of its size but also because it arrived on a Sunday, typically a quieter period for crypto network activity. Santiment data now puts the focus on whether that burst of participation can develop into sustained growth rather than fade as a one-day anomaly.

XRP currently trades around $1.25, leaving a clear divergence between improving network activity and subdued price action.

XRP Network Growth Accelerates Into November

The Santiment chart shows network growth remaining largely between roughly 2,000 and 3,000 new wallets per day during much of May through August, interrupted by several isolated spikes.

Activity began strengthening more noticeably from late September into October.

That trend accelerated into November. On Nov. 1, network growth jumped to 7,934 wallets, more than double the recent 30-day average of roughly 3,500. The chart’s latest reading remains elevated at about 4,101, suggesting activity did not immediately collapse back toward earlier baseline levels.

XRP network growth surging to 7,934 new wallets
Santiment data shows XRP network growth surging to 7,934 new wallets on Nov. 1 before holding near 4,101 as XRP trades around $1.25.

The latest expansion follows an earlier increase that pushed XRP Ledger non-empty wallets to a record 8.24 million, while daily network growth reached 4,772 during the previous surge.

That makes sustainability the more important question now. Another isolated spike would add to XRP’s sequence of strong network-growth days, but maintaining daily wallet creation around or above 4,000 would point to a broader shift in participation.

Binance Hack May Have Influenced Wallet Activity

The surge also arrived days after the Binance security breach.

The timing raises the possibility that the event encouraged some users to create fresh wallets or move toward self-custody. However, the data does not establish the Binance hack as the cause of the 7,934-wallet increase.

This distinction matters because XRP activity around the breach has been substantial. The Crypto Basic recently reported that a Binance hack-linked address moved 80 million XRP in two transactions within 50 seconds.

Santiment’s network-growth spike therefore followed an unusually active week for XRP, but the reason behind each newly created wallet cannot be determined from the metric alone.

XRP Price Still Needs to Confirm the Adoption Signal

The strongest disconnect in the chart is between XRP price and network activity.

While wallet creation has accelerated, XRP remains near $1.25, well below the roughly $1.50 area seen during late September.

That leaves $1.25 as the immediate price pivot, with $1.30 representing the first meaningful recovery level.

A move above $1.30 alongside daily network growth holding around or above 4,000 wallets would bring price and participation into better alignment. XRP has also recently seen buyers repeatedly defend the $1.24 region, making the current range particularly important.

The opposite scenario would weaken the signal. If XRP falls below $1.20 while network growth retreats below roughly 3,000 wallets per day, the latest adoption burst would look less convincing in the short term.

For now, the 7,934-wallet spike has established the size of XRP’s latest network-growth burst. The next test is whether daily creation can remain near 4,000 while XRP reclaims $1.30.

Oracle Prices $20 Billion Stock-and-Bond Offering, Sets Shares at $116

0

Oracle Corporation (NYSE: ORCL) finalized pricing for a $20 billion stock-and-bond offering late Monday, setting 86,206,897 new common shares at $116 each. The accompanying $10 billion debt offering carries approximately $776.75 million in annual contractual coupon payments across five bond series.

Before Monday’s market opened, Oracle filed preliminary SEC prospectuses for a proposed $10 billion common-stock offering and a separate $10 billion senior-notes offering. Its shares fell 8.76% to $119.22 in the regular session, before the company announced final pricing at 10:09 p.m. ET. The $116 offering price represents a roughly 2.7% discount to Monday’s closing price and an 11.2% discount to Friday’s $130.67 close.

Both offerings are expected to close on Wednesday, November 4, subject to customary closing conditions. The closing of either offering is not contingent on the other.

New Shares and Bonds Set Oracle’s Financing Terms

Oracle expects approximately $9.9 billion in net proceeds from the stock offering and $10 billion from the notes offering, after underwriting discounts and estimated expenses.

The new shares represent approximately 2.85% of the 3.024 billion common shares Oracle had outstanding on August 31, according to its SEC prospectus. The comparison shows how the proposed issuance compares with the earlier share count, but does not represent the final percentage of ownership dilution after the offering.

The debt offering consists of five fixed-rate bond tranches maturing between 2029 and 2046, with coupon rates ranging from 7% to 8.65%. The highest rate applies to $1.5 billion of notes due in 2046.

At their stated rates, the notes would require $776.75 million in annual coupon payments if all remain outstanding. That amount represents gross interest obligations, not necessarily an equivalent increase in Oracle’s net interest expense if the company uses proceeds to repay existing debt.

Monday’s selloff marked Oracle’s third consecutive losing session, leaving shares approximately 17.5% below their October 28 close of $144.54. Trading volume reached about 58.75 million shares, versus an average of 31.34 million over the previous 20 trading sessions.

Separately, Oracle Tokenized bStocks (ORCLB) was trading at $117.84, down 9% over the preceding 24 hours, according to CoinMarketCap. ORCLB trades as a tokenized instrument separate from Oracle’s NYSE-listed common stock, with its 24-hour price change reflecting a different trading period than the stock’s regular-session return.

Offering Matches Oracle’s October 28 Financing Plan

The newly priced transactions match the financing plan Oracle outlined at its October 28 Investor Day. Under that plan, Oracle committed to limiting additional capital-market funding for its fiscal 2027–2030 investment cycle to $20 billion, split between $10 billion in equity and $10 billion in gross debt, excluding refinancing of existing debt.

That financing is separate from a $20 billion at-the-market equity offering Oracle completed in the first quarter of fiscal 2027.

Oracle expects capital spending on its AI and cloud infrastructure expansion to peak in fiscal 2027 and 2028, with free cash flow turning positive in the second half of fiscal 2028.

Oracle said it could use the funds raised through the stock and bond offerings for general corporate purposes, including capital expenditures, repayment of existing debt, future investments or acquisitions, dividends, and share repurchases. The company has not specified how it plans to distribute the funds among these purposes.

Palantir Stock Falls as Contract Growth Slows and Long-Term RPO Declines

0

Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ: PLTR) shares were quoted nearly 8% lower early Tuesday after the company’s third-quarter earnings, released after Monday’s market close, showed slower growth in newly signed contract value and a decline in long-term remaining performance obligations despite revenue rising 96%.

The stock traded near $164.15 at 08:00 a.m. ET, approximately 8% below Monday’s closing price, according to Yahoo Finance. Palantir reported quarterly revenue of $2.313 billion and adjusted earnings of $0.44 per share, both exceeding analysts’ expectations.

However, total contract value (TCV) grew just 6% YoY to $2.918 billion, versus 49% growth in the second quarter. U.S. commercial TCV rose 11% to $1.463 billion, down sharply from 153% annual growth in the previous quarter.

The slowdown was also evident in quarterly comparisons. Total contract value was approximately 13.5% lower than the second-quarter figure of $3.373 billion, while U.S. commercial TCV was about 31.4% lower than its second-quarter level of $2.132 billion. Palantir closed 212 deals worth at least $1 million, down from 220 in the second quarter.

TCV measures the potential value of signed contracts, including unexercised customer options, rather than revenue the company has recognized.

Palantir’s Long-Term RPO Balance Falls $70 Million

Palantir’s third-quarter investor presentation showed that long-term remaining performance obligations (RPO) declined from $2.81 billion in the second quarter to $2.74 billion, a decrease of approximately 2.5%.

Total RPO slipped from $4.90 billion to $4.88 billion, while short-term obligations increased from $2.09 billion to $2.14 billion. The decline in reported long-term RPO outweighed the increase in short-term RPO. Total RPO nevertheless remained approximately 88% above its year-earlier level of $2.60 billion.

RPO represents non-cancelable contracted revenue that Palantir has not yet recognized. However, the company excludes contracts with original terms of 12 months or less from this disclosure, meaning the measure does not capture its entire contract backlog.

Chief Financial Officer David Glazer said RPO also excludes obligations beyond termination-for-convenience clauses, which are common in the company’s government contracts. He said the measure therefore primarily reflects Palantir’s commercial business.

Palantir separately reported that U.S. commercial remaining deal value increased 79% year-over-year and 4% sequentially to $6.517 billion. That broader contract measure includes potential future revenue not necessarily reflected in RPO. 

During Monday’s earnings call, Glazer said Palantir signed multiple eight-figure Sovereign AI contracts with shorter-than-usual durations as customers began adopting the company’s AI capabilities.

Glazer said management expects both the size and duration of those contracts to increase over time as customer adoption progresses. Palantir did not attribute the decline in long-term RPO to those shorter contracts.

Palantir Shares Extend Five-Session Decline Despite Stronger Revenue Outlook

Palantir shares closed Monday’s regular session at $178.34, down 3.13%, marking their fifth consecutive daily decline. The stock lost approximately 10.3% over those sessions and finished about 16.2% below its 52-week high of $212.94. 

Meanwhile, Palantir Tokenized bStocks (PLTRB), a tokenized product linked to Palantir shares, was trading at $164.14, down 12% over the preceding 24 hours, according to CoinMarketCap. The tokenized instrument trades separately from the Nasdaq-listed shares, and its 24-hour percentage change is not directly comparable with the stock’s premarket or regular session performance.

Despite the slower growth in contract signings, Palantir forecast fourth-quarter revenue of $2.649 billion to $2.653 billion, above analysts’ consensus of $2.46 billion. The midpoint implies sequential revenue growth of about 14.6%, compared with the 20% increase recorded in the third quarter.

The company also raised its full-year 2026 revenue guidance to between $8.530 billion and $8.534 billion, up from its previous forecast of $8.150 billion to $8.158 billion.

Apple Stock Falls as Manufacturing Commitments Jump $33 Billion Amid Margin Pressure

0

Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) shares fell 4.46% to $323.23 in premarket trading at 08:21 a.m. ET Tuesday, following an earnings call that disclosed a $33 billion increase in manufacturing purchase obligations and a weaker gross margin forecast for the holiday quarter.

The increase implies $90 billion in manufacturing commitments at the end of September, up nearly 58% from the $57 billion reported in Apple’s June-quarter SEC filing. However, the company had not yet disclosed the exact September figure in its annual report.

The margin warning followed stronger-than-expected fiscal fourth-quarter results. Apple reported revenue of $114.5 billion, up 12% year over year and above analysts’ expectations of approximately $113.4 billion. Diluted earnings reached $2.10 per share, compared with estimates of $1.99. The earnings figure included a $0.05-per-share benefit from tariff refunds.

Apple’s Manufacturing Commitments Near $90 Billion

CEO John Ternus disclosed the increase during Apple’s November 2 earnings call while discussing efforts to improve component availability.

Chief Operating Officer Sabih Khan said Apple expects memory-related supply constraints for Macs and iPads during the December quarter, with demand running ahead of its expectations.

Apple expects December-quarter revenue to grow 7% to 10% year over year, a forecast that accounts for continued supply constraints.

Apple’s June filing showed that $56.2 billion of its manufacturing purchase obligations were payable within 12 months. That payment schedule applied to the June balance, and the company has not yet provided an updated breakdown for September.

Manufacturing purchase obligations cover future purchases involving component suppliers and contract manufacturers. They do not represent debt or expenses already recorded in Apple’s financial statements.

Although the disclosure came during a discussion about memory-chip supplies, Apple did not specify how much of the additional commitments related to memory purchases.

Apple shares had already fallen for two consecutive regular trading sessions before Tuesday’s premarket decline, losing about 3% by Monday’s close at $338.32.

Separately, Apple Tokenized bStocks (AAPLB) was trading at $325.64, down 5.22% over the preceding 24 hours, according to CoinMarketCap. AAPLB is a tokenized instrument linked to Apple shares, and its 24-hour price change is separate from the Nasdaq-listed stock’s performance.

Rising Memory Costs Weigh on Apple’s Margin Outlook

Apple forecasts a gross margin of 45% to 46% for the December quarter, compared with 47.9% in September. The forecast fell short of analysts’ expectations of about 47%, adding to investor concerns about rising component costs.

The September figure included an approximately one-percentage-point benefit from tariff refunds. Excluding that benefit, the reported margin would have been about 46.9%, narrowing the comparison with the holiday-quarter forecast.

Chief Financial Officer Kevan Parekh said higher memory costs were expected to account for most of the sequential margin decline. The rollout of Apple’s Siri artificial intelligence features would also affect margins through cloud-service costs and the deferral of a portion of device revenue.

CEO John Ternus described current memory pricing as unprecedented and said the company expects prices to continue increasing beyond December.

Apple has raised prices on several Mac, iPad and iPhone models to help offset component costs. Lower-cost inventory carried into the quarter and savings on non-memory components have also provided some relief, although management expects the inventory benefit to diminish over time.

The company’s inventories rose to $14.54 billion in September from $11.09 billion in June, an increase of approximately 31%. Unlike future purchase commitments, inventories represent goods and components that Apple already holds.

Wall Street firms also revised their outlooks following the earnings report.

Goldman Sachs analyst Michael Ng lowered his Apple price target to $380 from $390 while maintaining a Buy rating. Ng cited stronger-than-expected iPhone and Mac demand but identified rising memory and AI costs as pressures on the company’s outlook.

Morgan Stanley analyst Erik Woodring reduced his target to $350 from $355 while maintaining an Overweight rating. The firm cited concerns about slowing Services growth and lowered its fiscal 2027 earnings-per-share estimate by $0.05 to $9.85. Morgan Stanley said the December-quarter margin guidance was about 100 basis points below its forecast largely because it had assumed roughly $1 billion in tariff refunds; excluding that assumption, the guidance was nearly in line with its expectations.

XRP Bollinger Bands Have Become Their Tightest Since Before the August Rally to $1.7

0

XRP Bollinger Bands have narrowed to their lowest levels since mid-August 2026, before the crypto asset recorded its last major rally toward $1.70.

This comes as XRP continues to trade sideways following the recent market-wide selloff. However, the drop in volatility has led to expectations that the token could be approaching another major price movement.

XRP Struggling to Recover After Binance Hack

XRP remains under pressure following the market-wide selloff triggered by the Binance hack, which reportedly resulted in losses of $6.3 billion from the exchange. During the incident, hackers moved nearly $300 million worth of XRP from Binance.

The exploit had an immediate effect on XRP, sending its price down 6.64% on the day. Since then, XRP has struggled to recover alongside the broader market. 

Buyers have managed to defend the $1.24 support area, but XRP has repeatedly failed to break above $1.27. A move past this resistance could give the price room to stage a stronger recovery.

After climbing back above $1.24, XRP has spent the past three days trading within a narrow range. This sideways movement has caused its Bollinger Bands to tighten considerably. Notably, such periods of low volatility often come before sharp price movements.

XRP Bollinger Bands Reach Their Tightest Levels Since August

The 4-hour chart shows that XRP Bollinger Bands have narrowed to their tightest levels since mid-August 2026. This is important because a similar setup appeared shortly before XRP staged its last major rally, which pushed the price close to $1.70 within a few days.

At press time, XRP trades at $1.2481. The upper Bollinger Band currently sits at $1.2556, while the lower band stands at $1.2433. This leaves only $0.0123 between the two bands, and this shows just how much volatility has dropped.

XRP Bollinger Bands reach their tightest level since before the August rally
XRP Bollinger Bands reach their tightest level since before the August rally

The difference is much smaller than the $0.1987 recorded between the upper and lower bands in early to mid-October. This decline shows that XRP has experienced a massive drop in price volatility over the past few weeks.

For context, Bollinger Bands measure price volatility by tracking the distance between an asset’s upper and lower price ranges. When volatility falls, the bands move closer together, and this creates what traders call a Bollinger Band squeeze.

This pattern often appears before a major price movement. When volatility returns, the price could break suddenly in either direction. However, a squeeze does not reveal whether the next move will be upward or downward.

XRP Bollinger Bands Before August Rally

Despite the neutral nature of the current structure, XRP bulls believe the next increase in volatility could push the price higher. Much of this optimism comes from the similarities between the current market conditions and those that appeared before the August rally.

On Aug. 18, XRP dropped to $0.9882 during a market-wide decline. The price later recovered slightly above $1 but failed to make further gains. This led to a three-day period of consolidation, during which the Bollinger Bands became extremely narrow.

By Aug. 19, the difference between the upper and lower bands had fallen to just $0.0073. This showed that XRP had entered a period of very low volatility, similar to what the four-hour chart is showing now.

The market eventually experienced a sudden return of volatility, which came with a strong upward move. XRP climbed to $1.6977 by Aug. 22, gaining approximately 71% from its Aug. 18 low of $0.9882.

These similarities have given XRP bulls reasons to expect another rally. Specifically, XRP has recently suffered a sharp decline, recovered above $1.24, and spent three days consolidating. This closely resembles the price action that preceded its August surge.

XRP MACD Also Shows Similarities to August

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) indicator on XRP’s four-hour chart is also showing a pattern similar to the one recorded in mid-August.

During that period, the MACD turned positive after XRP recovered from its decline. However, it remained within a very low positive range throughout the consolidation period. The indicator then strengthened as the rally began.

A similar pattern appears to be developing now. Following its recent recovery above $1.24, XRP MACD has continued to follow the same general structure seen in mid-August. 

However, these similarities do not guarantee that XRP will repeat its August rally. Although the indicators suggest that a major price movement could be approaching, the next move could still be downward. A further decline across the broader crypto market could also put additional pressure on XRP.

Big Pey Says Hoskinson Is Done With Cardano, Here’s Why

0

Popular ADA content creator Big Pey claims that IOG CEO Charles Hoskinson is shifting his attention and resources away from Cardano toward Midnight.

Explaining the rationale behind the reasoning, Big Pey argued that the Cardano Foundation has repeatedly obstructed Hoskinson’s initiatives. He also criticized EMURGO, describing the organization as incompetent following the hack involving its DeFi project, SecondFi.

According to Big Pey, Midnight offers Hoskinson an opportunity to overcome the institutional and organizational challenges that have constrained his work within Cardano. 

It bears mentioning that Hoskinson has publicly backed Midnight and demonstrated a strong commitment to its development. He disclosed a personal investment of $200 million in the project, underscoring the scale of that commitment.

Previous Disagreements Have Strained Cardano’s Leadership Relationships

Big Pey’s comments follow several disagreements between Hoskinson and the Cardano Foundation over the ecosystem’s commercial strategy, funding priorities, and development direction.

Hoskinson has previously criticized the Foundation’s approach to stablecoin integrations and other ecosystem initiatives. In addition, disputes over governance, funding, and allegations surrounding historical ADA allocations have contributed to tensions between the parties. 

Despite these disagreements, relations between Hoskinson and the Cardano Foundation have not remained entirely hostile. For instance, Hoskinson publicly supported the Foundation’s Cardano Summit 2026 funding proposal, although the initiative failed to secure the votes required for approval.

This continued cooperation suggests that differences over specific decisions have not necessarily ended their broader engagement with the Cardano ecosystem.

Hoskinson Has Not Abandoned Cardano

Although Big Pey claimed that Hoskinson is effectively done with Cardano, he clarified that he did not mean the founder has completely severed ties with the ecosystem. Instead, he suggested that Hoskinson could allocate more of his time, funding, and development resources to Midnight.

Hoskinson’s public statements and continued involvement in Cardano initiatives also complicate the claim that he is walking away from the project. The IOG founder has defended Cardano’s decentralized governance model, arguing that the ecosystem’s progress depends on collective participation rather than the efforts of a single individual.

Furthermore, Hoskinson has highlighted initiatives involving Midnight and RealFi, alongside integrations with infrastructure providers such as Circle, Pyth, and Fireblocks, as part of broader efforts to strengthen Cardano’s position.

Although Big Pey’s commentary raises questions about how Hoskinson may distribute his attention and resources between Cardano and Midnight, his claims do not establish that Hoskinson has abandoned Cardano.