Wall Street expert Linda Jones recently sparked discussions regarding Ripple’s celebration of the legal victory against the SEC last month.
In particular, Jones took to X to pose a question about Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse’s peculiar reference to the 78 days since the lawsuit victory judgment. She inquired whether there was a specific reason behind this mention or if it was merely a casual remark.
Jones invited other members of the XRP community to share their interpretations.
Question: At the #ProperParty, why did Brad Garlinghouse mention it was 78 days since they won the lawsuit? Was there a significant reason or just a mention, no big deal? Let me know your take, below.#XRP #Ripple pic.twitter.com/R3KHbMoDqB
— Linda P. Jones (@LindaPJones) October 10, 2023
What Could the 78-Day Reference Mean?
The XRP Army, known for ascribing meanings to seemingly ordinary events, weighed in on the conversation, offering diverse interpretations. An X user, Oro Georgio, speculated that Garlinghouse might be hinting at an upcoming development.
By adding 78 days to September 29, the day the Ripple Proper Party took place, Georgio arrived at a supposed auspicious date of December 16. The commenter noted that December 16 is close to Christmas, a festival widely celebrated in the United States.
Moreover, Georgio noted that the Ripple CEO initiated his speech referencing Christmas. This prompted the notion that Ripple might have something special in store for the XRP Army during the holiday season.
“Maybe they’ll give us a good price on XRP for Christmas,” Georgio speculated. Interestingly, the Wall Street expert agreed with this idea. “Love that,” she remarked in response. Notably, Georgio disclaimed his speculation should not count as financial advice.
Also, others contributed their thoughts on the significance of the 78-day reference. Some XRP enthusiasts pointed out that the Ripple Proper Party occurred precisely 78 days after the US court delivered the victory ruling about XRP’s non-security status.
Notably, these commenters seem to imply the reference to 78 days is a casual statement of fact with nothing underneath.
Meanwhile, another X user, Peter Ansell, proposed a different perspective. Ansell suggested that the mention of 78 days might have been a way to remind the staff of their landmark legal victory. According to him, this, in turn, could have been an opportunity for those in attendance to express their appreciation for the achievement.
Disclaimer: This content is informational and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author's personal opinions and do not reflect The Crypto Basic’s opinion. Readers are encouraged to do thorough research before making any investment decisions. The Crypto Basic is not responsible for any financial losses.
-Advertisement-
